

And that is just one of the many indirect effects of publicity. Now, even if you don't usually buy said product, when you are in an unfamiliar location and forced to choose from unfamiliar products, you will go for the one you know the most, even if you don't realise it. By spending so much money, they make you become familiar with their products. /r/OutOfTheLoop: Current events you may have missed.Įven if a campaign does not get you to buy a product, just the fact that they put it into your brain is immensely valuable./r/explainlikeimfive: Simple explanations of complex subjects./r/CasualConversation: Casual conversations (duh)./r/askscience: Professional-level scientific explanations./r/AskReddit: General questions and opinions.Try and be objective - a product may be legitimate even though you personally dislike it.We don't require that comments include sources, but we appreciate it when they do! Simply replying "Yes" or "No" can be confusing.


They ARE paying out for those their "internal investigation" concludes did not have insider knowledge of the stunt. He later clarified that he got a bunch of friends to make bets on his behalf and they COMBINED to win $374,000.īovada isn't canceling the whole prop bet. He originally said that he bet $50K on himself, but there was a $1,000 limit. It's still unclear what Andrade actually bet. We'll continue to make sure that any publicity stunts or ill-intended behavior cannot adversely affect the outcome of a player's wager." and all the other streaker-related bets that they've found to have "had knowledge" of his pre-planned attempt to run on the field.Ī spokesperson said, quote, "Our players have always trusted us to ensure the integrity of all props offered. The online sportsbook Bovada says it's "voiding" his bets. Well, that guy, Yuri Andrade, just got some bad news: He WON'T be cashing in. Remember the "Super Bowl Streaker," who claimed he won $374,000 betting on HIMSELF to rush the field?
